Consultation, dialogue and didactic discussion; revision, work reviews (presentation of student work, its joint analysis and discussion).*/**
Lectures*
Exercises */**
Workshop classes**
E-learning: e-mail exchange; group and individual on-line meetings; selected exercises conducted in remote mode. *

Due to epidemiological threat, classes will be conducted in hybrid mode:
* in remote (on-line) form, using electronic communication means and tools provided by the university. Contact with the use of academic mail of the Academy of Fine Arts in Warsaw and G Suite connected to it.
** in a traditional form - stationary, taking into account sanitary regulations, recommendations and guidelines of the State Sanitary Inspection bodies and regulations of the Rector of ASP in Warsaw. In justified cases we will enable the student to work remotely on a selected issue.

Passing the entrance exam for the first year of studies in sculpture

Didactic objectives (programme contents, course description) The aim of this course is to form student's own, individual language of artistic expression, the form of which will fully correspond to the topics taken up by him/her in the further process of education and in artistic practice. The aim of the classes is to stimulate and develop in the student a conscious perception of works of art and accompanying visual phenomena.

The program task for first-year sculpture students is to define the concepts of the language of artistic composition (description, analysis, interpretation), with particular emphasis on the specificity of the language of sculpture, i.e. solids and planes, as well as the study of relations between spatial entities.
At the same time, discussions of student projects will help to build awareness and consistency in the use of the language of forms and perception.

The program is partly open-ended, i.e. the realization of tasks is determined by the initial choice of given concepts or relations; this choice belongs to the student. This independence is an important incentive
to search for one's own language of artistic expression and to take responsibility for it. The discussion of assignments is public and assumes the active participation of all students.

The program task for second year sculpture students is to apply the concepts of the language of artistic composition, with particular emphasis on the specific language of sculpture i.e. solids and planes,
as well as applying relations between spatial entities. The working method is personal implementation of exercises by students and presentation of the results in the studio in order to discuss them, enriched by lectures on topics given to the students. The program is mostly open, i.e. the realization of the tasks is determined by the initial choice of given concepts or relations, the choice is up to the students.

The tasks are realized in the form of various sculpting techniques, creating spatial compositions, non-virtual, including cutting and pasting elements in order to use the motor factors of the human body
and highlight the role of decision-making in the design process.

1. Evaluation of the artistic and technical level of the works.
2. Evaluation of the degree of involvement in the program.
3. Evaluation of the level of involvement in the description and analysis of other students' work.
4. Evaluation of the level of knowledge and logical reasoning concerning specialization in the context of interdisciplinary education (lectures, conversation classes).
5. Evaluation of the level of public presentation.
6. The grading scale is determined by the scoring system in force at the Faculty.

Due to the epidemiological threat, credits and exams will be held in a hybrid mode: stationary and / or remote. Depending on the individual case, as well as the development of the pandemic situation.

1. Preparation and presentation of art work done in class for committee review.
2. Commission review after the first and second semester.
3. Final presentation of artistic work done in the third and fourth semester combined with an exam.

Due to the epidemiological threat, the reviews will take place in a hybrid mode: stationary and / or remote. Depending on the individual case, as well as the development of the pandemic situation.

15/ Literatura obowiązkowa wykorzystywana podczas zajęć Oskar Hansen Towards Open Form / Ku formie otwartej Warszawa 2004
Oskar Hansen Zobaczyć Świat Warszawa 2005
Rudolf Arnheim Sztuka i percepcja wzrokowa Gdańsk 2004
16/ Literatura uzupełniająca rekomendowana do samodzielnej pracy studenta Stefan Papp Przestrzeń Kraków 2002
Piotr Demianowicz Uspienski Czwarty wymiar Gdańsk 2001
E. H. Gombrich Sztuka i złudzenie Warszawa 1981
Pod redakcją Bogusława Żyłko Sztuka w świecie znaków Gdańsk 2002
Pod redakcją Andrzeja Mencwla Antropologia Kultury Zagadnienia i wybór tekstów Warszawa 2005
Bogdan Paczowski Zobaczyć Gdańsk 2005
John Berger O patrzeniu Warszawa 1999
John Berger Spotkania Warszawa 2001
Pod redakcją Marii Anny Potockiej Publiczna przestrzeń dla sztuki? Kraków 2003
Słownik terminologiczny Sztuk pięknych Warszawa1997
Pod redakcją Krystyny Wilkoszewskiej Czas przestrzeni Kraków 2008
Edward T. Hall Ukryty wymiar Warszawa 2009
Boris Uspienski Krzyż i koło Gdańsk 2010
Pod redakcją Ewy Rewers Miasto w sztuce – sztuka miasta Kraków 2010
Pod redakcją Michała Ostrowskiego Materia Sztuki, Kraków 2010
George Lakoff, Mark Jonson Metafory w naszym życiu Warszawa 2012
Bartosz Brożek, Mateusz Hohol Umysł matematyczny Kraków 2014